Washington State Department of Transportation v. Washington Natural Gas Co.

Good Law
51 F.3d 1489
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 1995Nos. 93-35088, 93-35130, 93-35137, 93-35289, 93-35292 and 93-35330California6,301 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tang, J.

This is a review of several judgments of the United States district court, western district of Washington. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) initiated this action against Washington Natural Gas Company (WNG), Pacificorp, and Advance Ross Corporation seeking recovery costs due under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 , et seq. On cross-motions for partial summary judgment, the district court concluded that the defendants were responsible parties under CERCLA § 107, 42 U.S.C. § 9607 . The district court conducted a bench trial to determine damages and entered a judgment in favor of WNG et al. The district court concluded that WSDOT was not entitled to recover its response costs because WSDOT did not comply with the National Contingency Plan (“NCP”) promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) pursuant to CERCLA.

The overarching issue on this appeal is whether WSDOT can recover its response costs. To answer this question, we must address several related issues. First, under 42 U.S.C § 9607(a), is a state entitled to a presumption that its actions are consistent with the NCP? The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.