Triad Systems Corporation, a California Corporation, and Jeffrey J. Lederman Michael J. Madison v. Southeastern Express Company, a Georgia De Facto Partnership, Dba Southeastern Brokerage Company and Dba Southeastern Systems, Triad Systems Corporation, a California Corporation v. Southeastern Express Company, a Georgia De Facto Partnership, Dba Southeastern Brokerage Company and Dba Southeastern Systems Southeastern Express Systems, Inc., a Georgia Corporation George Barnes, an Individual Kevin Clar, an Individual and Gerry Wambolt, an Individual

Good Law
64 F.3d 1330·95 Daily Journal DAR 11821·33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 468·36 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1028·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24426
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 199595-15552California5,195 words

Opinion

Opinion

64 F.3d 1330 1995 Copr.L.Dec. P 27,470 , 33 Fed.R.Serv.3d 468 , 36 U.S.P.Q.2d 1028 , 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6889 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11 ,821 TRIAD SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiff, and Jeffrey J. Lederman; Michael J. Madison, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTHEASTERN EXPRESS COMPANY, a Georgia de facto partnership, dba Southeastern Brokerage Company and dba Southeastern Systems, Defendants-Appellees. TRIAD SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SOUTHEASTERN EXPRESS COMPANY, a Georgia de facto partnership, dba Southeastern Brokerage Company and dba Southeastern Systems; Southeastern Express Systems, Inc., a Georgia corporation; George Barnes, an individual; Kevin Clar, an individual; and Gerry Wambolt, an individual, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 94-15818, 95-15552. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1995. Decided Aug. 31, 1995. Mary A. Lehman, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich, San Diego, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Daniel M. Wall, Charles S. Crompton, III, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee. Ronald S. Katz, Robert A. Christopher,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.