Schwarzschild

Schwarzschild v. Tse

Good Law
58 F.3d 430·1995 WL 368847
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 1995No. 93-16681California1,863 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

We consider here a narrow question of procedure involving notices in class action cases. We must decide whether a defendant who has succeeded in obtaining summary judgment may subsequently compel the named plaintiff to give the class the Rule 23(c)(2) notice that is ordinarily given shortly after class certification, or whether by obtaining judgment before the notice is given the defendant has waived any right to have notice sent to the purported class members.

I.

Richard T. Schwarzschild [plaintiff] sued Bernard K. Tse, et al. [defendants], for violations of Sections 13(e) and 14(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act, as well as for violations of the California Corporations Code. Plaintiff filed his claim in January of 1990. In July of that year, he moved for class certification. The district court granted the motion to certify on October 24th, 1991 and denied the defendants’ subsequent motion for reconsideration in July of 1992.

On October 9th, 1992, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment and a motion to ■ decertify the class. On the same day, plaintiff filed a motion for an order approving class notice. On December 9th, 1992, the district court entered an order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.