United States v. Real Property Located in El Dorado County at 6380 Little Canyon Road

Caution
59 F.3d 974·95 Daily Journal DAR 9185·1995 WL 408578·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16839·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5390
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 1995No. 93-15982California6,423 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sneed, J.

Robert Price appeals from a judgment of civil forfeiture against his 29.6 acres of property, including his own barn-residenee, another residence, and outbuildings. Price argues that (1) summary judgment in favor of the United States was improper because its evidence was obtained through an illegal search in violation of the Fourth Amendment, (2) his due process rights were violated when his property was seized without prior notice and a hearing, (3) forfeiture of his interest in the entire property violates the Eighth Amendment, (4) the civil forfeiture proceeding subjected him to double jeopardy, and (5) the civil forfeiture statute is unconstitutional.

These arguments, as informed by a rapidly expanding body of case law authority, have transformed a case commenced by a few bungling local sheriffs that initially appeared fairly straightforward into one bristling with quite complex constitutional issues. On reflection, this should not be surprising, inasmuch as drug-related forfeitures have become quantitatively quite large, while remaining until recently procedurally uncomplicated.

For reasons related to Price’s Eighth Amendment argument and recent developments under the Fifth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.