Portland Feminist Women's Health Center v. Advocates for Life, Inc.

Good Law
62 F.3d 280·95 Daily Journal DAR 14017·1994 WL 830213·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40869·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6070
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 1994No. 91-35512California2,966 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

This case involves an attempt by an abortion clinic to identify and to use a legal remedy to prevent anti-abortion activists from disrupting the performance of the clinic’s services to women. The plaintiff, Portland Feminist Women’s Health Center (“PFWHC”), sued right-to-life activists under, inter alia, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 (3) and 1986 on behalf of a class of women who sought to exercise their right to have an abortion. PFWHC claimed the defendants violated two of PFWHC’s patients’ constitutional rights: 1) the right to interstate travel; and, 2) the right to exercise their choice to have an abortion. The case was tried to a jury which returned a verdict against defendants Advocates for Life (“AFL”), Andrew Burnett, and Priscilla Martin. These defendants appealed.

*282 After oral argument, we deferred submission of this case pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 753 , 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993). After the Supreme Court decided Bray , we ordered the parties to brief the issues in light of Bray . Then, after due consideration of Bray , we issued an opinion oh September 20, 1993. Based on Bray , we reversed the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.