Collings

Collings v. Longview Fibre Co.

Good Law
63 F.3d 828
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 1995Nos. 94-35410, 94-35417, 94-35418, 94-35424 to 94-35426, 94-35431 and 94-35434California4,008 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Boochever, J.

Martin Collings and seven other former employees of Longview Fibre Company (“Longview”) appeal the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Longview in the employees’ consolidated employment discrimination action. The employees allege that Longview wrongfully terminated them for their drug addiction disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117 , and the Washington Law Against Discrimination, ,RCW 49.60.180. The district court found that Longview fired the employees, not because of their alleged drug addiction disability, but because of their drug-related misconduct at the workplace, and the court therefore dismissed their claims. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Each of the eight plaintiffs in this action worked in Longview Fibre Company’s box manufacturing plant in Washington. The plant contained large, fast-moving machinery which, when not handled properly, posed a risk of serious injury.

Longview imposed strict rules prohibiting employee use of drugs at the workplace. As a federal government contractor, Longview was governed by the Drug-Free Workplace Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 701-707 .

In May 1992, Longview hired the outside firm of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.