Lopez-Flores

United States v. Lopez-Flores

Good Law
63 F.3d 1468·1995 WL 470247·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21474·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6319
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 1995Nos. 93-50206, 93-50208, 93-50211 and 93-50216California4,674 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schroeder, J.

Defendants Jose Lopez-Flores, Jose Eduardo Hernandez, Jose Perez-Garcia and Jaime Ortiz-Mejia appeal their convictions after jury trial for hostage taking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1203 (a), and use of a firearm in a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). The appellants held captive an alien who had been smuggled illegally into the United States. They demanded an amount of money for his release that was substantially higher than the smuggling fee the alien had agreed to pay.

Appellants raise two principal issues on appeal. First, they argue that the Hostage Taking Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1203 , which criminalizes, inter alia, conduct that involves either a non-national perpetrator or non-national victim, violates the Equal Protection Clause by impermissibly classifying offenders and victims on the basis of alienage. Second, appellants argue that the Hostage Taking Act is inapplicable to a case involving alien smuggling.

The challenge to the constitutionality of the statute on equal protection grounds raises an issue of first impression in the federal courts. We conclude that the statute is constitutional as an exercise of Congress’ plenary powers over aliens and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.