Singh

Singh v. Ilchert

Bad Law
63 F.3d 1501·95 Daily Journal DAR 11313·1995 WL 502906·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23375·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6601
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 1995Nos. 94-15110, 94-15111California5,724 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schroeder, J.

Petitioner-appellee Harpinder Singh is a Sikh who attempted to enter this country illegally from India. He filed a habeas corpus petition in district court after the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) deemed him excludable and denied his applications for asylum pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 (a) & 1158(a) and withholding of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (h). The district court held that Singh had established that he had suffered past persecution on account of political opinion within the meaning of the applicable statutes and Ninth Circuit case law and remanded to the BIA for further proceedings.

Two principal questions are presented in the government’s appeal. The first is whether the district court erred when it rejected the BIA’s position that a person who suffered torture at the hands of police, as a result of his suspected association with separatist Sikh militants, had not suffered persecution on account of political opinion within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(42)(A). The second is whether the BIA violated applicable law when it required the applicant to establish a fear of country-wide persecution. The second issue has recently been decided…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.