Barnes

Barnes v. Independent Automobile Dealers Ass'n of California Health & Welfare Benefit Plan

Good Law
138 A.L.R. Fed. 793·64 F.3d 1389·95 Daily Journal DAR 12137·19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1958·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25260
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 1995No. 93-16049California3,812 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Boochever, J.

Susan Barnes appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Independent Automobile Dealers Association of California Health & Welfare Benefit Plan (“the Plan”). The district court found that the subrogation clause in the Plan’s benefit agreement prevented Barnes from recovering for medical expenses. We conclude that Barnes is entitled to recover for medical expenses and remand for entry of summary judgment in her favor.

FACTS

Susan Barnes was an employee beneficiary of the Plan, a self-funded employee medical benefit program. The Plan entitled Barnes to payment of medical bills incurred as the result of an accident.

In October 1990, Barnes’ car was hit from behind by a car driven by Catherine Clark. Clark disputed liability. Barnes underwent back surgery two months later, incurring medical bills totalling $23,075.40. As a result of the accident, Barnes lost time from work and incurred substantial pain and suffering. Barnes’ automobile insurance policy provided for $5000 in medical payments.

Barnes sued Clark in California state court in January 1991, including a damage claim for medical bills. In February, Barnes submitted an accident claim form to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.