City of Ketchikan v. Cape Fox Corp.

Good Law
65 F.3d 754·95 Daily Journal DAR 12049·1995 WL 521384·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24993·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7040
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 6, 1995No. 94-35316California2,055 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wiggins, J.

OVERVIEW

The City of Ketchikan (“the City” or “Appellant”) appeals a District Court order granting Cape Fox Corporation’s (“Cape Fox”) motion for summary judgment. The City sought conveyance from Cape Fox of fee title to 38 acres upon which the City’s Beaver Falls hydroelectric powerhouse is located. The district court ruled that the City was not entitled to the land under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (“ANCSA” or “the Act”) because the land did not qualify as a “primary place of business,” 43 U.S.C. § 1613 (c)(1), and the City’s utility did not qualify as a “nonprofit organization,” 43 U.S.C. § 1613 (c)(2). The City appeals the grant of summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Ketchikan Public Utilities (“KPU”), a nonprofit organization of the City of Ketchikan, operates electric, water, and telecommunications utilities. As part of its electric utility, it operates the Beaver Falls hydroelectric powerhouse approximately six miles outside of Ketchikan. The City constructed the facility in 1945…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.