MHC, Inc. v. Oregon Department of Revenue

Good Law
66 F.3d 1082·95 Daily Journal DAR 13078·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27650·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7612
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 29, 1995Nos. 94-35939, 94-35941 and 94-36238California4,804 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

These eases arise out of prior litigation brought by various railroads challenging provisions of the Oregon property tax scheme under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act. Pending the outcome of the primary litigation, the disputed taxes were placed into escrow accounts pursuant to a consent order entered upon stipulation of the parties. Eventually, Oregon prevailed on the merits. The present dispute centers on whether the railroads must pay the Oregon statutory rate of interest of 16% applicable to untimely paid taxes.

I.

Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases consist of various railroad and carline companies (hereinafter “railroads”). 1 This dispute arises out of lawsuits filed by the railroads under § 306 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act, 49 U.S.C. § 11503 (“4-R Act”), seeking to enjoin collection of allegedly discriminatory ad valorem property taxes. These challenges began in the mid-eighties and stretched over a long period of years. New suits were filed for each successive tax year on behalf of different railroads. Although only a small subset of the specific tax years is at issue in this appeal, numerous similar appeals have been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.