Trulis

Trulis v. Barton

Good Law
67 F.3d 779·95 Daily Journal DAR 12915·1995 WL 567124·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27511·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7528
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 1995Nos. 94-55024, 94-55049, and 94-55234California4,884 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Brunetti, J.

In the primary appeal, we are called on to put an end to a lawsuit that a bankruptcy court in a collateral proceeding has already held is released and barred. In the cross-appeal, we consider how much attorney misconduct a court should tolerate before imposing sanctions.

I.

This ease began with the bankruptcy of the Marbella Golf and Country Club (the Country Club), which had operated at a loss since its opening. To fund its operational deficit, the Country Club filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition to restructure the rights of its members. There are several classes of Country Club members: Series A Charter Gold Members, Series B Charter Gold Members, Series C Gold Members, Charter Silver Members, and House Members.

Shortly after the Country Club filed for bankruptcy, Jeffrey S. Benice, then an attorney with Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison, filed the present action on behalf of certain Country Club members. Specifically, the complaint named as plaintiffs Thomas Trulis, Eamon J. McClory, Erv Grosch, Thomas Swarthout, A1 Simon, Tom Ewing, and Michael Barrack. Daniel Callahan was originally named as a plaintiff in the action, but his name was removed as a plaintiff when the First…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.