Goldman

Goldman v. Salisbury (In re Goldman)

Good Law
70 F.3d 1028·95 Daily Journal DAR 15241·1995 WL 681252·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 28626·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8774
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 1995No. 94-55489California412 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed October 5, 1995, is redesignated as a per curiam opinion.

OPINION

George Goldman, a debtor in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, appeals the district court’s order overruling the bankruptcy court and denying him an extra homestead exemption under California Code of Civil Procedure § 704.730(a)(3). We reverse and remand.

Section 704.730(a)(3)(C) provides a special $100,000 homestead exemption to “[a] person 55 years of age or older with a gross annual income of not more than fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) ...” Goldman was over 55 years old when he filed for bankruptcy. The question is whether his “gross annual income” exceeded the statutory maximum.

The Bankruptcy Court held “the phrase ‘gross annual income’ as used in Section 704.730(a)(3)(C) means the 1993 calendar year [the year in which the petition was filed] and not the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the filing of the bankruptcy petition.” Under the bankruptcy court’s definition, Goldman’s “gross annual income” was less than $15,000, and Goldman therefore qualified for the $100,000 exemption.

Under the district court’s definition, Goldman’s gross annual income was more than…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.