Miller v. United States

Good Law
73 F.3d 878·95 Daily Journal DAR 16345·1995 WL 728211·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35040·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9373
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 1995No. 94-35629California2,745 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schwarzer, J.

Plaintiff, the widow of an Army sergeant who died in a military hospital in Japan, appeals the dismissal of her action against the government for negligent infliction of emotional distress. The issues on appeal are: (1) whether the foreign country exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2680 (k), in conjunction with the exclusive remedy provision of the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988 (“Liability Reform Act”), 28 U.S.C. § 2679 (d)(1), denies plaintiff equal protection of the laws under the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause; and (2) whether the statutory scheme operates as an unconstitutional taking of a valuable property right in violation of the Fifth Amendment.

FACTS

Plaintiff Sally Miller is the widow of Master Sergeant Lawrence Miller who died in a military hospital in Japan, allegedly as a result of malpractice by the military physicians who attended him. Plaintiff was present during the physicians’ course of diagnosis and treatment and here seeks damages for emotional distress she claims that she suffered as a result. In her amended complaint, brought under diversity jurisdiction, plaintiff named these physicians…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.