General Atomics v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Good Law
75 F.3d 536
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 1996No. 95-55520California2,386 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hug, J.

General Atomics appeals the district court’s dismissal of its suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court dismissed the claim holding that initial jurisdiction of the suit was vested in the courts of appeals. Alternatively, the court held that General Atomics’ suit was premature because the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had not entered a final appealable order. General Atomics asserts that the district court had jurisdiction over its claim or, in the alternative, that the district court should have transferred the case to this court for adjudication. We have jurisdiction of the appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Appellant General Atomics is the third-tier parent corporation of Sequoyah Fuels Corporation which holds a Source Materials License for its facility at Gore, Oklahoma issued from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”). 1 It does not hold any license *538 for the facility. General Atomics does have a license from the NRC for its TRIGA reactors, used in training, research and isotope production, and for its use of source materials in research and development, but General Atomics is not a licensee of the NRC in connection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.