Oregon RSA No. 6, Inc. v. Castle Rock Cellular of Oregon Ltd. Partnership

Good Law
76 F.3d 1003
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 1996Nos. 94-35903, 94-35965, 94-36009, 95-35168 and 95-35169California2,207 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Noonan, J.

Opinion by Judge NOONAN

ORDER

OPINION

Cellular, Inc., a Colorado corporation (Cellular); Castle Rock Cellular, Inc. (CRCI), a Colorado corporation; Castle Rock Cellular of Oregon Limited Partnership (CRCO), a Colorado partnership; and Pacific Telecom Cellular, Inc., a Delaware corporation (PTCI) appeal the judgment of the district court and the award of sanctions against them in a suit brought by Oregon RSA No. 6, Inc. (Oregon RSA). The merits of the case turn on the application of Oregon law to first refusal rights in a partnership agreement. Holding that the district court has accurately stated the law in this regard, we briefly summarize its conclusions. The sanctions for abuse of discovery involving the federal rules and the inherent authority of the district court we address more fully.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The Crook County RSA Limited Partnership (the Partnership) was formed in 1989 and was licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to provide cellular phone service in the Oregon Rural Service Area. As of August 1992, when the events involved in this litigation began, the Partnership shares were held 25 percent apiece by Oregon RSA, the general partner; U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.