Goomar ex rel. Goomar v. Centennial Life Insurance

Good Law
76 F.3d 1059·96 Daily Journal DAR 1917·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2574·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1128
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 21, 1996No. 94-55687California2,111 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nelson, J.

I.

Mohinder Goomar appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Centennial Life Insurance Company (Centennial) and Sentry Life Insurance Company (Sentry) on his claim for disability benefits. Dr. Goo-mar claims that his psychological disability led to the conduct that caused the loss of his medical license and his inability to work and that he is therefore entitled to disability benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Centennial and Sentry.

II.

Doctor Mohinder Goomar established a private ear, nose and throat medical practice in New York in 1971. The practice grew and prospered until April 1984, when a female college student publicly accused Dr. Goomar of making sexual advances and molesting her during an after-hours office examination. Two other women had previously complained of similar misconduct by Dr. Goomar in 1981 and 1983. A fourth victim reported a 1980 molestation after the 1984 victim’s charges were made public.

As a result of these accusations, the Regents Review Committee of the University of the State of New York initiated license revocation proceedings. Dr. Goomar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.