Felts v. Gomez

65 F.3d 174 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Norman Paul FELTS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director of Corrections; Gail Lewis, Deputy Warden; T. McAllister, Program Administrator; M.A. Johnson, Counselor; A. NMI Infante, Deputy Warden; Anderson, Dr., Chief Psychiatrist, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-56199. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 22, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Norman Paul Felts, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. A. Placement in Administrative Segregation 3 Felts contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for defendants on his claim that his placement in administrative segregation violated his due process rights. This contention lacks merit. 4…