Crawford Country Homeowners Ass'n v. Delta Savings & Loan

Good Law
77 F.3d 1163·96 Daily Journal DAR 2586·1996 WL 75663·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3941·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1542
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 1996No. 94-56156California1,122 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Brunetti, J.

The Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”) appeals the district court’s remand of the case to California Superior Court. The district court concluded that RTC’s removal was untimely. We reverse.

I

On April 23, 1992, Crawford Country Homeowners Association (“Crawford”) filed suit against Delta Savings and Loan alleging construction defects. On May 7, 1992, Delta was placed in an RTC receivership. Crawford complied with RTC’s request to dismiss its complaint against Delta pending exhaustion of the administrative claims process. On October 8, 1993, RTC denied Crawford’s claim and Crawford re-filed the complaint *1165 which was served upon RTC on March 1, 1994. Neither complaint named the RTC as a party. On March 30, 1994, RTC removed the action to the district court.

II

The remand of a removed case to state court is reviewed de novo. Eyak Native Village v. Exxon Corp., 25 F.3d 773, 777 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 351 , 130 L.Ed.2d 307 (1994), - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 778 , 779, 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).

RTC’s ability to remove cases to federal court is governed by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”), 12 U.S.C.A. § 1441a(l)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.