Richard Atilano v. David Mike Gilbert Jack Guenther John Moran Ewing Brothers, Inc. James M. Bixler Daniel Ahlstrom

Good Law
65 F.3d 174·1995 WL 501514·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30667
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 199595-15323California528 words

Opinion

Opinion

65 F.3d 174 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard ATILANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David Mike GILBERT; Jack Guenther; John Moran; Ewing Brothers, Inc.; James M. Bixler; Daniel Ahlstrom, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15323. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 23, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard Atilano appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). In his complaint, Atilano alleged that defendants, several Justices of the Peace, a private towing company, and various police officers, deprived him of his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's dismissal of an action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.