Antonio Barragan-Arellano v. United States

65 F.3d 174 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antonio BARRAGAN-ARELLANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-35106. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 23, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Antonio Barragan-Arellano, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. He contends the district court erred when it denied his motion as an abuse of the writ. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . After accepting the district court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous and reviewing its conclusions of law de novo, Doganiere v. United States, 914 F.2d 165, 167 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 940 (1991), we affirm. 3 This is Barragan-Arellano's second section 2255 motion. He raises claims not raised in his first section 2255 motion. Barragan-Arellano was…