Lisa Gygax Venus Maher v. Levi Grule Victor Swift Ted Walker Steve Carey Ernie Carpenter, of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors

65 F.3d 174 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lisa GYGAX; Venus Maher, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Levi GRULE; Victor Swift; Ted Walker; Steve Carey; Ernie Carpenter, of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15157. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 22, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiffs appeal the district court's dismissal of their civil rights action alleging violations of their first, fourth and fourteenth amendment rights. Their fourth amendment claim is based on an alleged trespass by several county employees. Their first and fourteenth amendment claims stem from the county's refusal to consider, respond to, or publish plaintiffs' untimely comments regarding the expansion of a nearby sewage treatment plant. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We agree with the district court that plaintiffs'…