Desmond Corr v. City and County of Honolulu

65 F.3d 174 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Desmond CORR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16918. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 22, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Desmond Corr appeals pro se from the judgment entered in favor of defendant in Corr's civil rights action against the city and county of Honolulu. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 4 Corr raises three issues on appeal: "perjurious police testimony, falsifying evidence, and destroying evidence." He fails, however, to present any facts or legal arguments that suggest the district court made any improper rulings, or that the jury's verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Although we liberally construe pro se appellate briefs, Corr's brief is completely void of the information necessary for us to determine whether…