Nelson By and Through Nelson v. Carpeneti

65 F.3d 175 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Taiya Lee Jones NELSON, By and Through her Father, Paul A.L. Nelson; and Paul A.L. Nelson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Walter J. CARPENETI, Rodger Pegues; Allen T. Compton; Daniel A. Moore; Mark Rausch; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35652. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 9, 1995. * Decided Aug. 23, 1995. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm. 3 The claims for damages were based on conduct which took place prior to the two year period preceding the filing of the complaint, so they are barred. Jenkins v. Daniels, 751 P.2d 19, 24 (Alaska 1988). Although Nelson claims that a conspiracy among the defendants lasted into the two years preceding the filing of his complaint, he offers no evidence for that…