Raymond Springer v. The City of Bend, an Oregon Municipal Corporation

65 F.3d 176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond SPRINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF BEND, An Oregon Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35137. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 5, 1995. Decided Aug. 24, 1995. As Amended Sept. 14, 1995. Before: CANBY and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and LEGGE, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM ** Raymond Springer appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Bend in this action asserting a taking claim. We affirm. BACKGROUND Springer bought the property in question in 1978. In 1980, lumber companies deeded adjacent land to the city, allowing the development of S.E. Division Street. In 1983, Springer applied for a zone change from light industrial to commercial. The lumber companies initially opposed the zone change, but eventually an agreement was reached placing certain restrictions on Springer's land and providing that the land…