United States v. James D. Harper, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
65 F.3d 176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James D. HARPER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10079. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 23, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James D. Harper, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of two post-conviction motions. Harper pleaded guilty to conspiring to deliver national defense information to a foreign government in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 794 . He was sentenced on May 14, 1984 to life imprisonment. He contends the district court erred when it denied his two post-conviction motions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 , and we affirm. 3 On October 7, 1993, Harper filed two motions: (1) to compel specific performance of his plea agreement; and (2) for relief from judgment. On February 1, 1994, the district court denied…