Benson A. Unanka v. Drug Enforcement Administration Dea/lax Transportation Group Los Angeles International Airport, Station, Los Angeles, California

65 F.3d 176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Benson A. UNANKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION; DEA/LAX Transportation Group; Los Angeles International Airport, Station, Los Angeles, California, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56608. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 22, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Benson A. Unanka appeals pro se the dismissal of his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). Unanka brought this action seeking the return of $32,550 and certain personal property. On appeal, Unanka contends that: (1) he did not receive a Notice of Seizure form; (2) the government failed to publish its intention to forfeit the currency as required by 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1607 (a); (3) the district court failed to address his claim regarding his personal property; and (4) the district court erred in…