United States v. Tracy Neil Lomax, AKA Ahad Hasan

65 F.3d 177 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tracy Neil LOMAX, aka Ahad Hasan, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30131. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 23, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tracy Neil Lomax (aka Ahad Hasan) appeals his conviction and 78-month sentence. Following a jury trial, Lomax was convicted of distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lomax's counsel submitted a brief stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Lomax has filed a supplemental pro se brief. 3 The only issue counsel identifies is whether the admission of a bodywire recording violated the Confrontation Clause. The bodywire recording contained conversations between…