Babbitt

Bicycle Trails Council v. Babbitt

Good Law
82 F.3d 1445·1996 WL 224491
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 1996No. 94-16920California12,046 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, authored by the Honorable Eugene F. Lynch. We adopt the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned order granting summary judgment, with the exception of the waiver analy *1449 sis in Parts 111(A)(1)(a) and 111(A)(2)(a), as to which we express no opinion. The district court’s order is appended hereto, as amended to reflect the omission of the waiver analysis.

AFFIRMED.

APPENDIX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Bicycle Trails Council of Marin, a California nonprofit corporation, Bicycle Trails Council of the East Bay, a California nonprofit corporation, International Mountain Bicycling Association, a California nonprofit corporation, League of Wheelmen, a Maryland nonprofit corporation, Charles Cunningham, Angela DiMeglio, Linda Enis, David Garoutte, Alan Goldman, Stephen Hoxie, James E. Jacobson, Abby Minot, Todd Oursten, and Adrienne Shapiro, as individuals, Plaintiffs, v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, James M. Ridenour, Director of the National Park Service, Brian O’Neill, General Superintendent of the Golden Gate National Recreation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.