United States v. Rodrigo Jaurique Umali

Good Law
65 F.3d 177·1995 WL 499497·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30635
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 199595-10077California212 words

Opinion

Opinion

65 F.3d 177 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodrigo Jaurique UMALI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10077. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 22, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rodrigo Jaurique Umali appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to sell firearms to a felon. Umali contends that the district court improperly denied his request for a downward departure on the ground that his criminal history category overrepresented his misdemenor conviction for nonsupport. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court's discretionary refusal to depart downward. See United States v. Heim, 15 F.3d 830, 833 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 55 (1994). 3 DISMISSED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.