United States v. Saul Pedraza-Murrillo

65 F.3d 177 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saul PEDRAZA-MURRILLO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50560. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 22, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Saul Pedraza-Murillo appeals his jury conviction of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (b)(2). Pedraza-Murillo contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for further discovery to support his claim of selective prosecution of Latinos. 3 Since the district court's decision in this case, we decided United States v. Armstrong, 48 F.3d 1508 (9th Cir.1995) (en banc). For the reasons set forth in United States v. Rendon-Abundez, No. 94-50352, slip op. 8319, 8320 (9th Cir. July 13, 1995), we remand to the district court for reconsideration of the motion in light of our opinions in…