United States v. William D. Helm

65 F.3d 177 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William D. HELM, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-30268, 94-30316, 94-30340. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 23, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals William D. Helm appeals pro se from three district court orders denying more than sixty motions, writs, petitions, and other requests for relief. Some of these filings relate to Helm's convictions for disposal of household waste on public land and creating a public disturbance, his subsequent sentence, and the retention of Helm's property by the government. We deny Helm's motion to stay this appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 1 3 Helm claims that the district court committed "major fraud," and that the "trail [sic] transcripts and video tape were fraudulent." Helm…