Dahl

Dahl v. City of Huntington Beach

Good Law
84 F.3d 363
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 1996Nos. 94-55971, 94-55972California1,868 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bright, J.

This case illuminates the growing incivility among contending lawyers which mars our justice system and harms clients and the public interest. James Christopher Dahl and Ronald L. Shugart brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and *365 1988 against the City of Huntington Beach, California (City) and various police officers, After extensive delays and abusive discovery conduct by attorneys for both parties, the district court eventually dismissed the entire case with prejudice. Dahl and Shugart appeal. We reverse the district court because outright dismissal penalizes Dahl and Shu-gart for their counsels’ bad behavior, but rewards the opposing parties, notwithstanding that opposing counsels’ uncivil conduct also contributed to the discovery problems.

1. BACKGROUND

Dahl and Shugart jointly filed suit in August 1991. Each alleged that in a separate incident he was viciously attacked by a police dog named “Brent” as he lay on the ground already restrained by officers, and that officers beat him and ordered the dog to bite him repeatedly. The injuries inflicted included deep dog bites on the thighs, groins, arms, and legs requiring stitches, permanent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.