Jet Investment, Inc. v. Department of the Army

Good Law
40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,934·84 F.3d 1137·96 Daily Journal DAR 5946·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11802·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3613
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 1996No. 94-16497California3,258 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Plaintiff, Jet Investments, Inc. (“Jet”), appeals the district court’s denial of declaratory and injunctive relief and grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Jet contends that the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) improperly determined that it was not a “Small Disadvantaged Business” under the Small Business Act Minority Small Business and Capital Ownership Development Program (“the 8(a) program”). 1 Having self-certified as a Small Disadvantaged Business, 2 Jet submitted a bid for a contract with defendant Department of the Army Directorate of Contracting to provide lodging, meals, and transportation to armed forces personnel applicants of the Military Entrance Processing Station in Oakland, California. The bid solicitation was restricted to small businesses. Defendant Convention Marketing Service, Inc. protested the Department of the Army’s restriction of bidding to small businesses. Pending resolution of that protest, the Department of the Army invited three qualified bidders to tender bids for an interim contract. Jet won this bid and was awarded the interim contract.

The Department of the Army conducted a second, unrestricted bid solicitation. Jet submitted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.