City of Ketchikan v. Cape Fox Corp.

Good Law
85 F.3d 1381·96 Daily Journal DAR 5951·1996 WL 325829·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11803·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3611
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 1996No. 94-35316California2,509 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wright, J.

This case involves interpretation of the land reconveyance provision of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. § 1613 (c). The City of Ketchikan seeks conveyance from the Cape Fox Corporation of surface title to 38 acres upon which its Beaver Falls hydroelectric powerhouse is located. The City appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Cape Fox. Upon de novo review, Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Congress enacted ANCSA in 1971. The Act is a legislative compromise, written in response to conflicts among the federal government, the state of Alaska, Alaska Natives and non-Native settlers over ownership of Alaskan lands. It awarded Alaska Natives $962.5 million and approximately 40 million acres of public land, in exchange for extinguishment of their aboriginal title claims. See 43 U.S.C. §§ 1603 ,1605(a), 1611.

The Act divides Alaska into 12 geographic regions, each with a Native Regional Corporation. 43 U.S.C. § 1606 (a). Within the Regional Corporations are approximately 200 Village Corporations. 43 U.S.C. § 1607 . Subject to certain restrictions, the Village and Regional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.