Taghizadeh

United States v. Taghizadeh

Good Law
87 F.3d 287·96 D.A.R. 7528·96 Daily Journal DAR 7528·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15305·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4718
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 1996No. 95-50222California1,680 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Scannlain, J.

We must decide whether customs officials improperly searched incoming foreign mail at Los Angeles International Airport.

I

On February 26, 1991, United States Customs Agents at Los Angeles International Airport took note of a package arriving from Turkey and addressed to “Ken Mondal” at a post office box in Irvine, California. Agent Paul Queja opened the package and found 75 sticks of opium, each about six inches long. Customs agents then resealed the package, delivered it to the Irvine post office, and caused a Notice of Delivery to be placed in Kamyar Taghizadeh’s post office box. When Taghizadeh picked up the package, law enforcement officers followed him home. Taghizadeh let them come inside to discuss the package, waived his Miranda rights, and consented to a search of his home.

To explain his possession of the package addressed to Ken Mondal, Taghizadeh said he was keeping it for a friend by that name who was in Germany. In what must have been an awkward moment for Taghizadeh, the agents showed him “Ken Mondal’s” driver’s license, which had Taghizadeh’s photograph and address on it. Taghizadeh then admitted that Ken Mondal was his alias, that he knew the package contained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.