Curry

WSB Electric, Inc. v. Curry

Good Law
88 F.3d 788·1996 WL 369425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 1996Nos. 94-16613, 94-16646California4,227 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

Appellants WSB Electric and J.R. Roberts are licensed contractors who perform public works contracts in the state of California. They brought suit against the California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) and its officers challenging the state’s enforcement of its prevailing wage law for public works contracts, Cal. Labor Code § 1770 et seq. They claim that the state law is preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) because California’s prevailing wage rate is measured by reference to the prevailing cash wage plus the prevailing benefits contributions of employers in a given locality.

The district court found that ERISA does not preempt the prevailing wage statute, and appellants filed a timely appeal. We affirm.

I

This case originally began in 1989, when both contractors filed separate actions to enjoin the DIR from enforcing California’s prevailing wage law for state public works projects. The state’s prevailing wage law requires that public works contractors pay their employees a minimum wage, called the “prevailing rate of per diem wages.” Cal. Labor Code §§ 1771 & 1773. This prevailing wage is determined on a county-by-eounty basis,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.