Rude

United States v. Rude

Bad Law
88 F.3d 1538·96 Daily Journal DAR 8275·45 Fed. R. Serv. 245·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 16390·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5143
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 1996Nos. 95-30198, 95-30205, 95-30207 and 95-30208California7,659 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lay, J.

These consolidated appeals involve a scheme to defraud investors, including Unity House, Inc., a Hawaii non-profit corporation, of several million dollars. Morreon B. Rude, Rodney H.S. Kim, and Stafford Mew appeal their judgments of conviction for wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy. Charles Andrews, who pleaded guilty to one count of testifying falsely before a grand jury in exchange for cooperation in the prosecution of *1542 the other defendants, appeals his sentence. We affirm.

THE “PRIME BANK NOTE” SCHEME

At trial the government adduced evidence that the defendants conspired to induce investments in what they termed “prime bank note” transactions. 1 The subject transactions were described to potential investors as a form of international bank paper purchased from issuing banks at a discount and sold to wholesale banks for a profit. Defendants held themselves out as persons experienced in such transactions and assured potential investors that the notes would yield monthly returns of roughly two to five percent. They further represented that the investments would not be at risk and in fact would remain in the investors’ own accounts. Each of these representations was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.