United States v. Northrop Corp.

Good Law
91 F.3d 1211
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 1996No. 95-55175California4,041 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thomas, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether the equitable tolling provision of the False Claims Act statute of limitations ap *1213 plies to a qui tam plaintiff as well as to the government. We conclude that it does, but that for the qui tam plaintiff the limitations period runs from the date the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known of the facts material to the right of action. Thus, we affirm the district court’s dismissal, albeit on different grounds.

Background

Qui tam plaintiff Michael A. Hyatt (“Hyatt”) worked as an engineer at Northrop Corporation (“Northrop”) from August of 1981 to May 13, 1986. In late 1982, Hyatt reported to his superiors his concerns that the Inertial Measurement Unit used in the Peacekeeper (“MX”) missile program was defective in its design, development and manufacture. He alleges that soon thereafter he began to suffer harassment in retaliation for his report. Northrop terminated Hyatt on May 13,1986.

Hyatt filed his first complaint against Northrop on October 3, 1986 (“Hyatt I ”) asserting, among other claims, a qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq. (“FCA” or “Act”). Included in the complaint was an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.