American Ad Management, Inc. v. GTE Corp.

Good Law
92 F.3d 781·96 Daily Journal DAR 9028·1996 WL 417088·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18376·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5506
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 1996No. 94-56207California5,740 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lynch, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs/appellants American Ad Management, Inc. and O’Connor Agency (collectively “American”) originally filed separate complaints against defendants/appellees General Telephone Company of California and related companies (collectively “GTE”). These eom-plaints alleged various federal anti-trust violations, as well as supplemental state claims. 1 The two cases, which arose out of the same course of conduct by GTE, were consolidated by the district court and summary judgment was granted in favor of GTE in both cases. American timely filed its notice of appeal, and therefore jurisdiction in this Court is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We reverse and remand.

American is an Authorized Selling Representative (“ASR”) which sells advertising in phone directories which are commonly known as “yellow pages.” GTE is a publisher of yellow pages. Although the characterization of this relationship is the subject of much of the present dispute, at this point it will suffice to note that customers may purchase yellow pages advertising either directly from a publisher such as GTE, or through the use of an ASR such as American.

On March 15, 1994, the district court granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.