United States v. Argent Chemical Laboratories, Inc.

Good Law
93 F.3d 572·96 Daily Journal DAR 10005·1996 WL 465363·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20462·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6117
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 1996No. 95-35167California2,848 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Canby, J.

Under procedures authorized by Congress, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) seized allegedly adulterated products from the premises of a regulated veterinary drug manufacturer, without obtaining a warrant from a judicial officer issued upon a finding of probable cause. The question before us is whether that seizure violated the Fourth Amendment. We conclude that it did not, and we reverse the judgment of the district court.

I.The Factual Background

Argent Chemical Laboratories manufactures and repackages veterinary drugs. FDA agents inspected Argent several times between the summer of 1993 and May 1994 to ensure compliance with the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. (“Act”). The FDA cited Argent for certain deficiencies. Several months after the last inspection, the FDA agents secured from the Deputy Clerk of the District Court, without the intervention of a judicial officer or a showing of probable cause, an in rem arrest warrant for various veterinary drugs alleged to violate the Act. FDA agents and United States Marshals then seized over $100,000 worth of veterinary drugs from Argent’s premises.

This condemnation action followed. Argent appeared as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.