Sanders

Sanders v. City of San Diego

Good Law
93 F.3d 1423·1996 WL 438878·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19504·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5826
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 6, 1996No. 95-55122California5,684 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wiggins, J.

John Sanders (dba Golden Rule Pawn Brokerage) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of San Diego and Detective Mark Michel in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 , 1985, and 1988. Sanders contends that the warrantless seizure of allegedly stolen property from his pawn shop and the police de *1425 partment’s return of stolen property to its owner violated Sanders’ right to procedural due process. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we AFFIRM in part and REVERSE and REMAND in part.

I.

Linda Hardeman, a nurse’s aide employed to provide in-home care to Audrey Moore, stole numerous items of jewelry from Moore. On October 26, 1993, Hardeman pawned two of these items, a necklace and ring, at Sanders’ pawn shop. As required by law, Sanders reported both loan transactions to the San Diego Police Department.

In November 1993, Detective Mark Michel was assigned to investigate Moore’s complaint concerning several missing pieces of jewelry. Michel obtained a detailed description of the missing items from Moore’s daughter, Pamela Kish; he then began to investigate the possibility that one of Moore’s health care givers had stolen the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.