Shalala

Lodi Community Hospital v. Shalala

Good Law
94 F.3d 1251·96 Daily Journal DAR 10665·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22408·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6486
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 1996No. 95-15958California2,537 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wiggins, J.

OVERVIEW

Lodi Community Hospital and Chico Community Hospital, both authorized providers of Medicare services, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the Secretary of Health and Human Services, upholding the Secretary’s disallowance of reimbursement for interest on a loan incurred by Paracelsus Healthcare Corporation to purchase 100 percent of appellants’ stock. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

FACTS

The facts are undisputed. In 1985, NME Hospitals, Inc. negotiated with Paracelsus, a private for-profit health care organization that owns or leases and operates hospitals, to sell Lodi Community Hospital and Chico Community Hospital to Paracelsus. ' The parties structured the sale through a stock transfer, whereby NME formed two subsidiary corporations — Lodi Community Hospital, Inc. and Chico Community Hospital, Inc. — and assigned all the assets and some of the liabilities of the hospitals to the two subsidiary corporations. NME then sold all the stock in both corporations to Paracelsus for $37 million. 1 Paracelsus financed the purchase with a bank loan.

Afterward, Paracelsus treated the transaction as a purchase of assets on its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.