Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Indian Reservation v. Washington

Good Law
96 Daily Journal DAR 10923·96 F.3d 334·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23325·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6678
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 6, 1996Nos. 95-35370, 95-35371California5,317 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wright, J.

This case involves claims by two Indian tribes in Southwest Washington to off-reservation fishing rights. The Shoalwater Bay Tribe and the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Indian Reservation have no such rights by treaty, but they assert that they have implied fishing rights arising from the executive orders creating their reservations. They also argue that they are entitled to the treaty fishing rights of the Quinault Tribe. Finally, they argue that they have extant fishing rights based on Chehalis aboriginal title. Allied against the Tribes on appeal are the United States, the State of Washington and the Quinault Tribe.

In its findings of fact and conclusions of law, the district court concluded that the Tribes’ claims were not well-founded. We agree and affirm the judgment of the court. We also affirm the court’s judgment on the question of the boundaries of the Chehalis Reservation.

BACKGROUND

A. Introduction

The Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Indian Reservation (“Chehalis Tribe”) occupy a reservation at the confluence of the Black and Chehalis Rivers in Southwest Washington. This reservation was created by secretarial order in 1864. Tribal membership…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.