Arata

Arata v. Nu Skin International, Inc.

Good Law
96 F.3d 1265
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 1996No. 95-15870California1,877 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sneed, J.

Defendant-appellant Clara McDermott appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to enforce the settlement agreement entered into between the settlement class, represented by Patricia Arata, and defendants Nu Skin International, Inc. (“Nu Skin”), Blake M. Roney, Keith Halls, Steven J. Lund, and Clara McDermott in the underlying class action. McDermott contends, first, that the district court erred in terminating its jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement; and second, that the claims subsequently filed against her by Don Lasko in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas are precluded by the terms of the Arata settlement agreement. Because we affirm the district court’s decision to ter- *1267 mínate its continuing jurisdiction, we do not reach McDermott’s second contention.

I.

FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Nu Skin is a Utah-based network marketing organization that sells skin care, hair care, and nutritional products through independent distributors. These individuals under Nu Skin’s plan make an initial investment to acquire a distributorship and inventory. They profit both by selling the products and by recruiting new distributors…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.