S & N Equipment Co. v. Casa Grande Cotton Finance Co.

Good Law
96 Daily Journal DAR 11794·97 F.3d 337·1996 WL 544216·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24972·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7190
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 1996No. 94-16303California5,297 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Plaintiff, S & N Equipment Company (S & N), a general partnership, appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for summaiy judgment and the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Casa Grande Cotton Finance Company (Casa Grande) and Chiekasha Cotton Oil Company (Chiekasha). S & N alleges that Casa Grande violated state and federal banking law by conditioning financing on the purchase of ginning services from gins owned by Chiekasha. The district court concluded that the transactions were not illegal under Arizona’s usury law or the Bank Holding Company Act. We affirm in *340 part and reverse and remand in part for further proceedings.

I

From 1988 to 1991, Casa Grande, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chickasha, made loans to S & N for cotton crop production. 1 The loans totalled more than $3 million, and the interest on the loans exceeded ten percent from January 1,1988 to May 15,1991. 2 Casa Grande expressly conditioned the loans on S & N’s processing its cotton at cotton gins owned by Chickasha. 3 Casa Grande required its borrowers to pledge their crops as collateral, maintaining that the ginning requirement ensures proper monitoring of the crops.

S…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.