Wilson

Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson

Good Law
99 F.3d 321·1996 WL 625081
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 1996Nos. 93-16609, 93-16745California203 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

By order dated December 5, 1995 this panel construed appellees’ letter briefs of August 28, 1995 as a renewed petition for rehearing in light of a California appellate court decision. We deferred consideration of the petition pending the decision by the California Supreme Court in that ease, Western Telcon v. California State Lottery, 13 Cal.4th 475 , 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 812 , 917 P.2d 651 (1996). The California Court has issued its opinion and the parties have filed additional letter briefs on the impact of Western Telcon on our decision in this matter. We have considered the arguments of the parties and are not persuaded that the decision in Western Telcon has any impact on our decision in Rumsey. Therefore, our opinion will remain unchanged.

The motion of GTECH Corporation for leave to file an amicus brief regarding the remand order in this matter is DENIED.

The Opinion filed on November 15, 1994, as amended August 11, 1995, slip op. 9977, and appearing at 64 F.3d 1250 (9th Cir.1995), is further amended as follows:

With this amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the appellees’ renewed petition for rehearing.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED. The mandate shall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.