Lopez-Galarza

Lopez-Galarza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
96 Daily Journal DAR 13541·99 F.3d 954·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29156·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8143
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 8, 1996No. 94-70683California4,376 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Opinion by Judge MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS; Concurrence by Judge BEEZER.

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

Mercedes Lina Lopez-Galarza and her son, Raul Jose Hemandez-Lopez, petition for review of the final order of deportation of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the BIA”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we grant the petition. We hold that Lopez-Galarza has demonstrated past persecution sufficient to establish eligibility for asylum, and we remand to the BIA for a determination of whether she and her son are entitled to asylum as a matter of discretion.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Petitioner is a 32-year-old native and citizen of Nicaragua. Her 7-year-old son seeks derivative asylee status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (c). Lopez-Galarza and her son concede deportability under 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(1)(B) (entry without inspection), but seek asylum under 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a) or withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (h) based on the experiences of Lopez-Galarza and her family.

Lopez-Galarza’s father, Julio Alfredo Lopez, was an officer of the National Guard during the Somoza era. Because of his affiliation with the Somoza regime, the…

Concurring Opinion

Beezer, J.

concurring:

The BIA failed to adequately consider Lopez-Galarza’s claim of past persecution at the hands of Sandinista authorities. Ka *964 zlauskas v. INS, 46 F.3d 902, 906 (9th Cir.1995). I concur in the judgment of the court.

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.