95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7360, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,573, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,919 Jack W. Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak

65 F.3d 1514 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7360 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,573, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16 ,919 Jack W. FRIEND, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald KOLODZIECZAK, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-16918. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted * May 22, 1995. Decided Sept. 19, 1995. Ferguson, Circuit Judge, dissented and filed opinion. Richard L. Reynolds, Bennett, Samuelsen, Reynolds & Allard, Oakland, CA, for defendants-appellants. Amitai Schwartz, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: PEGERSON, FERGUSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 We affirm the district court's order on remand for the reasons stated in the district court's Memorandum and Order Re Attorneys' Fees and Costs (On Remand), filed September 14, 1993, attached as Appendix A. APPENDIX A 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Jack Wayne Friend, et al., Plaintiffs, 4 v. 5 Ronald Kolodzieczak, et al., Defendants. No. C 87-0161 MHP 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS (ON REMAND) 7 This case is back before this court on remand from…