95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7429, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,741 American Jewish Congress Eve Slaff Alan Sieroty Devera Lurie Waldman Charles Waldman v. City of Beverly Hills Allan L. Alexander, Mayor Bernard J. Hecht Robert K. Tanenbaum Maxwell H. Salter Vicki Reynolds, and Chabad of California, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee

Good Law
65 F.3d 1539
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 199593-55085California7,780 words

Opinion

Opinion

65 F.3d 1539 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7429 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,741 AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS; Eve Slaff; Alan Sieroty; Devera Lurie Waldman; Charles Waldman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS; Allan L. Alexander, Mayor; Bernard J. Hecht; Robert K. Tanenbaum; Maxwell H. Salter; Vicki Reynolds, Defendants-Appellees, and Chabad of California, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. No. 93-55085. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1994. Decided Sept. 22, 1995. Carol A. Sobel, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Douglas E. Mirell, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Harry L. Gershon, Richards, Watson & Gershon, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. Jeffrey G. Kichaven, Alschuler, Grossman & Pines, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-intervenor-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: FLETCHER, CANBY and HALL, Circuit Judges. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiffs-appellants, the American Jewish Congress and individual members (collectively "the Jewish Congress"), challenge under the religion clauses of the United States and California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.